You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: that sounds like a violation of privacy [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. that sounds like a violation of privacy
If there was such a number, wouldn't a crook want to use it to clean out the account? Also, that would seem to require a lot of staff time and/or waiting at the register. When I call any business today, even my local credit union, I first get a machine and then get put on hold. I can imagine a big bank getting thousands of calls with such a system and requiring a couple full time staff people just to answer them. Probably they abandoned that practice as credit cards and now debit cards became so much more ubiquitous. Certainly they were not using that system in 1997 when I made my trip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC