You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #119: Yes, that was my point. You (not me) are confused. Not sure how I could have been more clear. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #103
119. Yes, that was my point. You (not me) are confused. Not sure how I could have been more clear.
Edited on Mon May-09-11 12:01 AM by BzaDem
This time, the confusion is that you think just because people can make posts on an Internet message board about there not being enough evidence to indict OBL somehow means there wasn't enough evidence to indict OBL.

When you correct for your false assumption, it makes much more sense. See how that works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC