You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gaming out the White House’s jobs agenda [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 02:25 PM
Original message
Gaming out the White House’s jobs agenda
Advertisements [?]

Gaming out the White House’s jobs agenda

By Steve Benen

We know President Obama will present a new economic plan in a few weeks, and while we don’t know what’s in it, the early hints http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_08/the_real_grand_bargain031618.php">offer some encouragement.

But as we consider what’s likely to unfold in the coming months, the optimism about the still-unannounced plan is quickly tempered. Thanks to the midterm elections, public antagonism towards “stimulus” initiatives, and the direction of the larger political winds, it’s seems fair to say the new agenda probably won’t be immediately and warmly received.

Jonathan Bernstein considers whether the president’s upcoming speech will matter at all.

The question on the policy end is whether Congress will adopt the president’s suggestions (not likely, depending on the specifics) and if they were adopted, what difference they would make.

Another key question is this: Is Obama’s speech likely to have a significant impact on public opinion? Political science tells us that presidential speeches don’t have much of an impact. Does that make it a bad idea? No, not really.

Presidential speeches can make modest contributions to agenda-setting, so if there’s a chance that a big speech can change the direction of inside-the-Beltway conversations, then it’s worth a try.

Of course it is.

<...>

But the policy efficacy won’t matter if Congress kills the bill. So why unveil a jobs agenda Republicans will reflexively reject? Because now is probably a good time to overcome what Paul Krugman called “learned helplessness.”

Krugman argued in May, “As I see it, policy makers are sinking into a condition of learned helplessness on the jobs issue: the more they fail to do anything about the problem, the more they convince themselves that there’s nothing they could do. And those of us who know better should be doing all we can to break that vicious circle.”

Obama, if the reports are accurate, appears ready to help break that vicious circle, even if Republicans won’t accept it.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC