You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #57: No it isn't disingenuous [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. No it isn't disingenuous
I started an answer to your post right after you posted (apparently). Again, I had intended for the post to have poll numbers in it. I took some time trying to find them after I clicked reply (that is how I usually do it). My dog started to act up so I took him out and then decided to go shopping for dinner. When I got back I finished the post and posted it.

as to your other point, I said, I am going to be just like you and only talk about what I want to talk about. I said it quite clearly in the post. In short, I am not going to discuss Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC