Reply #27: Oh

[ProSense]

"because it is a gay rights organization not a civil rights organization. "

...that's brilliant!

"I don't think if Johnson is actively opposed to civil rights like say Rep Paul, he should be endorsed, but if he is reasonable on them then I don't see why they shouldn't endorse."

So you went from calling for an endorsement, to admitting you don't know his positions, to now stating that these position's don't really matter as long as they're not as bad as Paul's?

Why not just admit that this, “President Obama has improved the lives of LGBT Americans more than any President in history,” is what's bothering you?

Can't have that out there, have to try to justify why a Republican with questionable positions on civil rights should also be endorsed.