You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #54: Why doesn't Olbermann and Maddow, at minimum, mention any of this? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
54. Why doesn't Olbermann and Maddow, at minimum, mention any of this?
Because it doesn't fit with their populist "follow the crowd" anger meme. I'm not making fun at honest anger about this because it is completely justified. What is not justified is to rage about it, pretending that nothing is being done while ignoring the actual facts of what's being done. http://www.whitehouse.gov/deepwater-bp-oil-spill /

And what about big mouth lunatic Carville? He feels the need to go on TV to rage and claim that the government has a "hands off" policy, while admitting in the same breath that Obama can't really do anything to stop the leak. If James is so concerned, you'd think he'd at least be informed about what is actually happening, but nooooooooo.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/26/870060/-There-isnt-a-magic-wand-to-make-this-go-away

On the most important point, Carville himself concedes that President Obama can't plug the hole. But he offers two concrete proposals for what the administration could have done to aid cleanup, neither of which would actually do that much.

First, he embraces the idea advanced by the former CEO of Shell that we simply use oil tankers to skim oil off the surface. That sounds great, except when you remember that most of the freaking oil isn't on the surface.

Second, he says Obama should get the Army Corps of Engineers to cut the red tape and approve the plan by Plaquemines Parrish to build a 60-mile stretch of barrier islands to keep the oil out. Two problems: (1) even on an accelerated schedule, the islands will take at least six months to build and (2) doing it that quickly means that the first storm the comes along will wash them away, including the sand used to build them which is in short supply. So the sand barrier would take too long to build, and even if we do build it, it will was away.

On an emotional level, I have tremendous sympathy for what Carville is saying. Like him, I live in southeastern Louisiana, so this is happening in my backyard (though I've only just recently moved here). But he seems to believe that the President could just wave a magic wand and fix this problem and make the oil go away. Well, he can't. When you spill over one hundred million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico (with millions more being added each day), there just aren't any easy solutions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC