Reply #63: I call them observations

[demhistorian]

Yes, it was an opinion piece

It was presented as fact. This line alone is slanderous: "Dana Milbank transcribed an article written by Rahm Emanuel today in The Washington Post."

No, I didn't go out of my way to point out Cenk is former Republican. The implies it took a measurable amount of effort or inconvenience. It didn't.

Have I given a definition of "the left?" I scanned my posts again and saw no such definition.

It's pretty obvious the roots of Rahm-o-phobia stems from Dean's loyal followers.

<[[I'm open about who I work for. When I ask others who constantly defend the admin and smear critics (no matter the facts), the thread gets deleted. So enjoy your "employees" jabs, but also take note of the deleted sub-threads. I'm not saying anything, I'm just sayin'.>]]

That's because DU admins consider that line of reasoning an accusation of paid shilling, as if defenders of a Democratic administration on a Democratic message board have to be paid to defend their leaders. :eyes: