You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: White House persists in refusing to provide information to the House Judiciary Committee [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. White House persists in refusing to provide information to the House Judiciary Committee
House Democrat on Gonzales: The country cannot wait
Michael Roston
Published: Monday May 21, 2007
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/House_Democrat_on_Gonzales_The_country_0521.html


A Democratic Congressman who is pushing for a vote of no confidence against the Attorney General said in a late afternoon press conference that Alberto Gonzales had 'low regard' for the US Attorneys working for the Justice Department, and that the country cannot wait for the end of the Bush administration to bring his tenure to a close. ....

... in the House of Representatives today, Democratic Congress members who are investigating the firing of the 8 US Attorneys renewed their focus on another area of concern: the White House's role in deciding which Attorneys were and were not fired.

"Even without a single document or witness interview provided by the White House, it is clear that the White House played an important role in the events concerning the US Attorney controversy," Reps. John Conyers (D-MI) and Linda Sanchez (D-CA) wrote in a letter to White House Counsel Fred Fielding. "If the White House persists in refusing to provide information to the House Judiciary Committee, or even to discuss providing such information, on a voluntary basis, we will have no alternative but to begin to resort to the compulsory process in order to carry out our oversight responsibilities."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC