You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Research 2000 Issues Cease & Desist Order to FiveThirtyEight [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 11:16 PM
Original message
Research 2000 Issues Cease & Desist Order to FiveThirtyEight
Advertisements [?]
Source: FiveThirtyEight

About 15 minutes ago, I was sent a cease and desist demand by Howrey LLP, the lawfirm that Research 2000 has contracted with to defend it against Daily Kos, which is suing it for fraud based on evidence that its polling may have been fabricated.

The cease and desist letter, which is published below, attributes to FiveThrityEight statements that were made by others. It alleges that "you have engaged in a campaign to discredit and damage R2K by posting negative comments regarding Mr. Ali, the Company, and its work products on the "Daily Kos" blog. It further threatens a lawsuit, unless I "immediately cease and desist all such activities, and retract all previous publicly transmitted statements."

I emphatically stand behind any statements I have made about Research 2000, and will be constrained by nothing other than my common sense and my professional integrity in any comments I should elect to make about Research 2000 in the future.

Read more: http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/06/research-2000-issues-cease-desist.html



I think Nate is starting to get at something that we really need. Some accountability for polling firms. He recently published some pollster ratings and got slammed by a bunch of pollsters for them. What's shocking is that there are no other pollster ratings out there and no real way to know if a pollster is faking data. There are ways that pollsters could "randomize" their data to make it impossible to tell if it was fraud. Strategic Visions LLC was another polling firm that Nate questioned earlier this year, and while its (Republican) clients never sued them, they have stopped doing any polling and look to have stopped while they were ahead.

You can read the letter in the link. I think it's maddening that pollsters can get away with such things so easily in this day and age. And polls do have real impacts on our politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC