You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: Nader didn't lose the 2000 election for Gore, Gore and the democratic party did! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
47. Nader didn't lose the 2000 election for Gore, Gore and the democratic party did!
Gore was pathetic debating the imbecile Bush. I could have debated Bush and made him a laughingstock. If Gore had the guts the vote wouldn't have even been close enough for the Supreme Court to steal the election. And because the CPD, headed by one democrat and one republican, decided to prevent Nader from participating in the debates we ended up with Gore nodding in agreement with most of what Bush said. It looked like a charade, and the people who I knew at the time wondered if the fix was in. It looked like a corporate sponsored debate with those pulling the strings totally unconcerned whether it was Bush or Gore in the White House. But those same powers that be were terrified of Ralph Nader and his message of truth, which would have exposed massive corruption in Washington. Remember: It was Nader who said, "Bush is nothing but a corporation masquerading as a human being". If he was allowed to debate Bush it would have destroyed any chance Bush could have been elected. But once again: Corporations 1, People 0.

If democrats weren't so terrified of Ralph Nader and true democracy, they would have let him debate, and since Gore didn't have the guts to expose Bush for what he was, Nader sure would have. Nader would have made Bush look like the laughingstock he was. But the corrupt powers that be (CPD) were so terrified of Nader they excluded him from the debates. Hell, at one debate they even prevented him from showing up and entering a screening room, far away from the actual debate, even though Nader had a ticket. They had Nader escorted by police away. Corporations feared Nader, so did the democratic leaders who were in bed with those same corporations.

And then Gore made the blunder to ask for recounts of just a few of Florida's districts, instead of a statewide recount. Even the Supreme Court could not have prevented the state from a statewide recount.

I'm always amazed at how people are still blaming Nader, when democratic candidates seem so eager to give away elections because they are so gutless to have real debates.

Having said all the above. I like Gore. But I know with 100% certainty that I could have debated Bush and made him look like an imbecile. Why Gore refused to go after him is still a mystery. And frankly, no one should be president if they can't beat the likes of a corporate prostitute like Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC