You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: No, just allow them to unionize. Support EFCA too. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. No, just allow them to unionize. Support EFCA too.
Edited on Sun Apr-11-10 05:52 PM by 4lbs
All the mine 'accidents' the last 4 years have been in non-union mines.

Non-union mines that have hundreds, if not thousands, of safety violations and aren't held accountable to get them fixed.

A union would hold the mine owners responsible to remedy those violations before they'd allow their workers inside.

When is the last time a unionized mine had such a devastating incident?

Allowing the workers to be co-owners and thus, also be told of the safety violations, works too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC