Reply #13: SECOND: let me say this, about that...

[thotzRthingz]

1. I only degrade an "abortion" to the level of "elective surgery" in an attempt to get freepers to upgrade their position to that same level... once it is considered to be "elective" then we can agree it is also a matter of "choice".

2. I actually do not equate a "nose job" with an "abortion" and that applies to the other examples I used as well... again only an attempt to categorize "abortion" as "elective" and therefore it being simply a matter of "choice.

3. If you are among those who think that there are ZERO CASES where what is normally considered (by insurance companies) to be "elective" ... where those same CASES not are being categorized by doctors as a "medical necessity" ... thus "gaming the system" to get the procedure covered ... you're quite naive, and I envy your innocence.

THIRDLY (and lastly): let me say that the unanimous ridicule of my OP (perhaps a very poor attempt at thinking outside the box at best) is taken only as so much constructive criticism, for that I thank you all.

Have a nice day.