You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #85: Not always. But someone ought to take that particular piece of legal fiction to SCOTUS. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #43
85. Not always. But someone ought to take that particular piece of legal fiction to SCOTUS.
Multiple baggies goes to ability. Not motive. In fact everyone I know that's been charged that way had no actual intent to sell it. That law simply alleviates the states burden of proof. They only have to show ability. Motive and opportunity become irrelevant. Besides in this case the felony charge was based on weight and not multiple baggie. He would have been the same even if it was in one baggie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC