You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #14: Yes, it's narrow and irrational. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

damntexdem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-22-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4

14. Yes, it's narrow and irrational.

Down on a "t-shirt species" that uses up too much conservation money. Where does this guy think the money comes from, with what motivation? The panda has been a useful conservation logo because it elicits love, excitement, and donations. It has been most-fortunate for the WWF that pandas are big and cute.

The only redeeming feature of the article would be were it satire, an Onion-like effort. Unfortunately, I don't think that it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.