You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: Almost a good point [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. Almost a good point
Except that Limbaugh gets his attention anyway. By putting the onus on the minority party Republicans, Obama has rather cleverly left them with two options: (A) admit that Limbaugh is an official spokesman for the Republican party; or (B) distance themselves from Limbaugh and deny that he speaks in any official capacity for the GOP.

For years, Limbaugh and the Republicans have gotten away with using Limbaugh as an unofficial spokesman distributing right wing talking points. Whenever his rantings got taken too seriously, both Limbaugh and the Republican party danced away from controversy, claiming that Limbaugh was "just an entertainer." Limbaugh likes to style himself as the Fourth Branch of the federal government, and it suits the GOP to kiss up to him.

Obama's talking about him because Limbaugh has stated publicly that he hopes Obama fails. In rough terms, Limbaugh is saying that the country can go to hell as long as it benefits him personally. By putting those words on the Republican "brand," Obama is basically turning a right wing talking point back on them: That is, for years, the Republicans conflated opposition to Bush administration policies as treasonous opposition to the United States. Now, Obama says that what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander; if Democrats were hoping for the failure of Republican policies and the downfall of America, then the Republicans can fairly be said to be doing the same thing.

Of course, the Democrats were doing no such thing during the Bush years. We simply pointed out that the inevitable result of the cock-eyed Bush policies was going to be failure, not that we hoped they would fail. Fuzzing up this rather easily distinguishable point was a political gold mine for the Republicans, at least for a while. It surely helped Bush steal his re-election in 2004, when the media chuckleheads couldn't figure this out. But by the time Sarah Palin came along, trying to take this tired old dogma out for a walk, it failed miserably.

Limbaugh is trying to revive the talking point, but its day has probably passed. Obama putting it on the GOP almost surely is the death rattle for this bogus bit of demagoguery.

Does that explain the "why" of it for you in sufficient detail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC