You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #132: No. I'm not going to go rounds with an anti-vaccer. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #125
132. No. I'm not going to go rounds with an anti-vaccer.
So, this is my last post to you on the subject. The people who feel there is a benefit to not vaccinating are wrong. Vaccination has a very slight risk level that is hugely, massively outweighed by the benefits. It's like a person who buys a lottery ticket certain they're going to win. Only they're gambling with something a hell of a lot more precious. And it's not just the well-being of their own child, but the public good of children everywhere they're gambling with as well. The whole anti-vaccination movement sickens me because of it. The more people who make that choice? The worse off everyone is. Whole diseases were all but completely eradicated, and now those diseases are coming back because of those choices. These diseases can and do kill. But, I'm not going to argue with you further. I've argued with an anti-vaccer before. If you're convinced there's a benefit to not vaccinating? Nothing I can say will change your mind, because it's like a frigging cult. I've learned my lesson. People will disagree as to what's most logical? No. There's nothing logical about not vaccinating.

It's simple, really. It was a normal practice 20 years ago, because there wasn't a vaccine for this disease that has the potential to kill, but is worse to get as an adult. It wasn't such a crazy idea then. It is a crazy idea now. Because there's a vaccine for this disease that has the potential to kill.

Yes. Driving is indeed a rather significant risk. But also a rather necessary one. If you don't drive, it's much harder to live in our society, unless you relocate to New York City. The benefit does indeed outweigh the risk. The benefit to the risk of vaccination? Even better. Because unlike those who've bought into the whole anti-vac bullcrap, the very, very tiny insignificant risk is hugely outweighed by the benefit. It's an even better return on the risk than with driving. Your child is much much much more likely to contract the disease, and even more likely to die of that disease, then they are to suffer the negative consequences of the vaccine. Risk/benefit ratio not even close to being the same as driving. But, again. I doubt I'll change your mind. I've learned my lesson. So, not going back and forth on this any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC