You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you guys know the problem with Bush is that he listened to Reid and Pelosi.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 05:47 PM
Original message
Did you guys know the problem with Bush is that he listened to Reid and Pelosi....
Advertisements [?]
too much and caved to their demands?

:eyes:

Wow. Alternate universe time, for sure.

Needless to say, I just got off the phone with a right-wing relative who spouted the typical RW talking points (Powell's endorsement was ALL about race, Obama is the one who made race an issue, his radical liberal beliefs will ruin this country, PALIN is the PERFECT person to lead the country, etc., etc.).

Just wow.

But the kick in the ass was a rather fascinating discussion about politics, religion and theocracy.

Because he is a "true Christian" which, in his literal biblical interpretation view means that he and other "good Christians" must proselytize, he doesn't see how a politician can separate religious views from political actions/governance (he talked about Biden saying he is a good Catholic yet won't impose that on others).

Yet, in the next breath, he says he doesn't want a theocracy.

:shrug:

Whaaaaaaa?

He doesn't believe in separation of church and state and believes The Founders intended this to be a nation governed by Judeo-Christian values.

I think I found my litmus test: if someone believes in a LITERAL interpretation of the bible, that impacts ALL RATIONAL interpretation of anything else, and therefore they want to live in a completely different world than I do. No doubt, all religious types who believe in a LITERAL interpretation of their sacred texts are the same.

No, if they believe in a literal interpretation of texts thousands of years old, interpreted and translated by innumerable humans over the course of time, they need to live somewhere where they can rely on GOD and GOD ONLY to provide them with health and prosperity, without impacting other human beings not of the same belief.

Oh yeah, the real kick in the ass is how these same "fundamental, evangelical Christians" talk about The Word yet refuse to live by it; fuck the poor -- everyone who is in a less-than-wonderful situation is there STRICTLY by choice, including the homeless veterans.

At first he attacked me when I mentioned that one-quarter of the homeless are veterans -- he said I'm listening to John Edwards too much -- but then said, "Even if it were true, they are there by choice and don't have to be there."

Sorry if there are typos and words left out, but these interactions always leave my head spinning and my hands shaking.

Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....................take me away, Calgon.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC