Reply #22: Hey Michael I seem to have found the original source .....

[doublethink]

to a couple of the pictures in question ..... they were downloaded tonight (well yesterday actually)

here's two links http://www.flickr.com/photos/30076181@N02/2814199887/meta/in/photostream

http://www.flickr.com/photos/30076181@N02/2814979078/meta/in/photostream

The info on the page say they were both taken on March 19 2005 ....... according to the EXIF data ....... but it seems the
original poster is claiming they were taken in the spring of 2008. ????? If ya click on each picture they get larger ... can
you run these through your program and see whats up? Peace ... think I'm ready for a nap ...... will check back in here in a
few hours to see if ya had a chance to check them out.

ps: if the camera wasn't properly set when bought by the consumer ..... (date etc...) could that throw the EXIF date off? Or
is the EXIF calender, timer pre-programed into the camera beforehand so it can't be messed with except when doctoring info
with each image after downloading? Curious.