Reply #151: Re: your edit

[GaYellowDawg]

You took away from the maturity of the discussion a long time ago by arguing in a stupid fashion. You maintained that some guy who went to the press over putting his Bible in a drawer didn't have an agenda, then said he wasn't necessarily anti-evolution, then said that he wasn't necessarily teaching anti-evolution. You know, sometimes you can make reasonable inferences. It is reasonable to infer that this guy is a fundamentalist publicity whore who's had an agenda for a long time, and you know it.

You argue like Ken Hamm, and because of that, you deserve a little "game set match" type abuse. Your idea of "critical thinking" is to cling to an argument beyond any reasonable point and think you're clever because of it. That's adolescent.