You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #160: Was that intended not to be a complete non-sequitur? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Donald Ian Rankin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-31-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #152

160. Was that intended not to be a complete non-sequitur?

If so, I'm afraid it failed.

For what it's worth, I would have no problem with children of mine (assuming I ever have children) being cared for by an adult who had killed someone when fourteen, if they had been successfully rehabilitated. I would not be happy with children being entrusted to someone who had committed murder as an adult, no matter what had happened in the intervening time, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.