You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: The entire tax structure needs an overhaul but i really like your analogy. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The entire tax structure needs an overhaul but i really like your analogy.
Edited on Wed Aug-01-07 10:50 PM by A HERETIC I AM
I remember hearing years ago a TV interview with a guy that lived in Amsterdam. When asked about the American concept of "Unearned Income" he laughed and said that gains from investing - putting money into that market that helps companies grow - is absolutely earned income and found that American idea of Earned and Unearned income curious.

For the purposes of clarity, it should be noted that if you buy a stock on January 1st at $10.00 a share and on December 31st it is at $15.00 a share and you sell, you have short term capital gains of $5.00. The IRS says if you hold that stock for at least 366 days and sell, it is long term. The difference in tax rate is typically 35% (short term) vs 15%.

I think the limit or threshold should be lowered to the $250,000 AGI range and for short term gains lowering the rate to 30% and for long term, raise the rate to 20%. This would encourage investors like yourself and only slightly change the tax rate for those in the higher income bracket. The higher the AGI, the higher the rate of long term gains taxation. I would be interested in seeing how much more revenue such a change would generate for the Treasury.

I also think there needs to be a serious change in the way the income produced by an LLC is taxed.

On edit to say the above sounds confusing to me and i typed it! I am by no means a tax expert and that is why.
What i am trying to drive at is if a person makes more than say $250,000/yr in wages, they should have to pay a higher rate on their capital gains. The rate should be on a scale - the higher the AGI, the higher the cap gains tax rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC