You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #201: No...
[View All]
PoliticAverse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-04-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #192 |
|
They took a step up from having no fire service.
The people in the county outside of the cities had no fire service.
The cities with government provided taxpayer financed fire service offered
to cover residents in the county currently without fire service if they would
pay a fee to help cover the cost.
It has nothing to do with privatization.
If anything it's a step towards extending government provided fire service via
taxes.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread