Reply #34: You're uninformed...again...

[BradBlog]

If by "electronic track that records every move", you are referring to the audit logs on these systems, it's already been found in the state of CA and elsehwhere that a) the audit logs can be changed and b) good luck getting at those audit logs for examination!

The Rawl campaign was not allowed to examine the hardware or software (or audit logs) from the voting systems. These are 100% unverifiable election results. Period. And the case that Rawl put on to show as much -- and to show that voters had much trouble voting, was very impressive.

Most of the board members who spoke against overturning the results said they recognized the problems with the machines, but didn't want to open a can of worms by overturning an election (and then have to answer why they allowed all the other ones to stand).

Whether Greene was a "plant" or not, has nothing to do with how he managed to get 59% of the vote. There is NO reasonable explanation for that, other than computer malfunction or tampering.