Reply #12: I guess I have to explain my thoughts on that episode.

[RandomThoughts]

Whatever metaphors a person has, and their is bias in that film, or a belief system within it.

But it still speaks of a good source, in that clip the doctor. He was trying to rescue, then he refused to kill to the point of death.

But the point is the doctor saying no, and then talking about destroying the daleks goes against that concept, the doctor can not be a destroyer, that is the paradox created.

So how is that paradox solved, by the doctor refusing to kill. But that just solves the doctor paradox, and is what we are told in the concept of the just son not killing the father but protecting the father from bad. Because the imbalance still exist as the good source is threatened by concepts of bad, without the counter to that.


Then the bad wolf creates itself, and yea I understand the concept and where it is bad, but it is the effect of bad done, and creation of rules applied back.

Basically treating people badly without justice creates that same effect put back on people, because the doctor can not do it, it is done by the creation of bad, bad.

So if a person does bad, to create bad, that bad will kill what made it, the idea of son killing the father in doctrines of many destruction. What you create will be what is there when you get older, if you create bad, bad will be what you get. In the same way if you create justice you will get justice.

So should you create good with justice or bad and then reap that same bad when rules get applied back.

The song is the contradiction, saying that a person is innocent and has not done any bad, while actually swearing they are not of light and truth, which is what bad does when it claims some role it does not have a reason to have. But the person is good while also saying he is bad, And then the effect is the gun of light and truth they do not have and do have, ends up doing them in by rules applied back by something they created with there bad action. No offense to singer, it is outside of that context, and not about the singer.

The doctor could not, nor would he hurt anything, but to protect that ideal of compassion and justice, what is created from bad destroys bad. All destruction is self destruction, and rules applied back is how people end up reaping what they have done, either now or in the after.

But anyway, I find the show interesting, and when I think about claims of righteousness with questionable action, I think on that episode. And to the people that think every clip is the meaning they want it to mean, that is your thoughts on it. Not worse or better, just different.

So the paradox is, a just person doing bad, a good thought saying it is not good, or a person requiring just action not getting it. All create a paradox and an imbalance that creates something to fix that imbalance.

It explains how some damage to a part of existence is not bad, but a needed break up of bad caused by the actions of that bad. It solves the problem of the claim that something can not be of good and do something that causes some hardship for someone even if that person deserves it, like breaking up corporations. It is not bad from the people breaking it up, it is the bad from the group being broken up funneled through a person fixing the imbalance. Hence how good can end up creating justice that can cause hardship, since it really is the bad causing it, and the good is only the administrator of that flow of self destruction.

Or to make it simpler, mirror held up to Medusa.