You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: But Labour wasn't up for a multi-party coalition [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. But Labour wasn't up for a multi-party coalition
and so the choice was a coalition with the Tories, or just let the Tories govern on their own. That would keep the Lib Dems ideologically pure, and they could have hoped for Labour to get its act together, the Tories to screw things up, and then for another hung parliament with the combined Labour and Lib Dem seats to be enough to form a government. But it would need all of those to happen. And then Labour would still not be keen on PR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC