You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: That's because they can't control their sexual desires. And would [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. That's because they can't control their sexual desires. And would
f**k anything that would let them. I've known jerks like that. When stuck serving with them, carrying a ratcheting cable cutter with you could make the point "leave me alone". (Just flick it open, and start ratcheting it down as you looked them straight in the eye while they were trying to hit on you...)

I joined the Navy in '77. Went to "C" school in '78/'79 at the same command (and barracks complexes) that some Pac-deployed River-Rats (aka "Swift Boaters")were based, and knew quite a few of them while I was there and heard "all the stories" - or at least a good number of them - and saw some of the pictures that didn't get tacked on the cork-board next to their desks or shown to the wife and kids at home.
I'm not saying they were a swell bunch of guys - they liked shock value and pretty much only respected people who took them at their own value and didn't freak out easily.

These guys, some of whom were still rotating "in-country" supporting black-ops or the CIA, cared only that the guys serving with them 1) did their jobs without bitching and knew their limitations, 2) didn't get anyone else killed if or when they skirted the system (i.e., black market dealings or getting drunk), 3) didn't stink too much, and 4) weren't insufferable assholes who couldn't take a joke or got shocked too easily.

Looking back with a bit more of an experienced eye, I'm pretty sure that at least two of the 'Rats I played ping-pong or pool with at the barracks when there was nothing else to do were gay. No one cared about anyone else's personal lives unless there was drama that could become distracting to the mission.

A personal relationship or lifestyle that was not easily prosecutable (i.e. - consenting adults) and did not cause drama or hassle the command did not concern anyone in the military unless they were nosy idiots. Not when I first enlisted, not on my ship in the early 80's, not during Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the early '90s, not when I retired in 1998, not now while I'm still supporting the Navy and still have contact with the military "culture".

That congress-critter was playing to his crowd - and he was probably a Vietnam era REMP at best.

Bet his uni was always pressed and his shoes were always shiney...

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC