Reply #105: Get a clue- that decision was a paradigm shift

[depakid]

One that required courage (and had some unfortunate language in it, vis: "all deliberate speed.").

You think that because people and dynamics were working in the background, that the profound change Brown wrought was somehow "incremental?

Come on. That's a laughable proposition. The deals you cite are always working in the background.

Not sure what history books you may (or may not) have opened- or which portions of the world they covered, but one thing that's for certain, you've demonstrated almost no understanding of the development of American law- nor how broader concepts like incrementalism, paradigm shifts or "muddling through" work via public or private administration.

So yes- we've run into a wall where I'm prepared to call you not only utterly clueless- and as partisanly disingenuous as many Republicans, and further- utterly and incapable of learning or adapting to the 21st Century.

As I implied in the previous post- your views are basically CW dinosaurs.

Sooner or later- they'll be weeded out- by one process or another.

If your staring down an impressive loss to a party that's damn near certifiable at this point won't teach you to have a look at that introspectively, then perhaps nothing will.