You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #104: Brown v. Board of Education wasn't incremental change? REALLY? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #103
104. Brown v. Board of Education wasn't incremental change? REALLY?
Edited on Mon May-03-10 02:41 AM by BzaDem
You have NO CLUE what you are talking about. NONE.

Brown vs. Board of Education and its progeny are perhaps one of the greatest examples of how incremental steps bring about change in ways that sweeping steps don't. The road to Brown vs. Board of Education was carefully crafted by the NAACP and other civil rights lawyers for DECADES. They started in earnest in 1935, and thought it strategically prudent to start with law schools. After all, white laywers and judges clearly knew the extent of the inequality of law school accommodations among the races

They started by challenging separate but clearly unequal law schools, and established precedent requiring their equalization. They gradually moved towards demanding that black students be admitted to white law schools after showing that equalization was failing and impossible. All along the way, they incrementally established major Supreme Court precedents (such as Sweatt v. Painter) that could later be used to strike down segregation as a concept altogether. They also established a multi-decade factual record of how equalizing never happens.

Finally, in 1954, armed with evidence and precedent borne out of the prevoius 20 years, they challenged public school segregation head-on as inherrently unequal (even if the accomodations could be considered equal in and of themselves). They were able to win because the precedents they helped craft in their long hard fight lead inexorably to that conclusion.

What would have happened if they went straight for "transformative" change in 1935, and challenged segregation head-on then? The Supreme Court most likely would have issed a unanimous decision affirming Plessy vs. Ferguson, which would have set back the fight against segregation for a generation or more.

And you are the one telling me that I am advancing failed arguments. What a joke. I would open a history book and read a few pages before you decide which of us is actually spouting failed arguments. In the future, if you are trying to cite an example of "transformative change," make sure you don't accidentally cite one of the biggest incremental and long-fought battles of the century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC