You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: I wouldn't insult folks by caling them "unintelligent" for not voting for a backstabber [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. I wouldn't insult folks by caling them "unintelligent" for not voting for a backstabber
Edited on Sun May-02-10 08:24 PM by depakid
Indeed- I would say that they're looking longer term than you, and saying "enough's enough" and "decline's decline."

The trouble with your theory is that it doesn't subscribe to any sort of accountability among politicians- which is precisely the process that over time has led the Democrats to essentially become 1970's Republicans and abandon their traditional attitudes, beliefs and values. This is why your nation is in an inexorable decline- you embrace poor public policy, under the impression that less poor is better.

It would also seem that the Obama administration and some Senate Democrats cynically subscribe to this as well, and thus squandered a once in a generation (or a lifetime) opportunity to enact meaningful, if not structural change to one major set of problems (and processes) after another.

Some "change" cannot by it's very nature be done incrementally- it has to involve a paradigm shift, or it simply will not occur.

And this is the sort of change that like or not was expected- if not expressly and explicitly promised. Moreover, this was the sort of expectation that was created- and reinforced throughout the campaign. Once again, it's human nature to be disappointed- and some of that's inevitable, but it's never wise to take constituencies for granted, much less repeatedly insult them, while creating the perception that you're bending over backwards to work with (an for?) their opponents or advancing their opponents issues.

Doing so creates a vacuum- and politics, like nature abhors a vacuum. Create one and someone or some party will come along and fill it.

Perhaps successfully.

Witness the Liberal Democrats in Britain or the Greens in Tasmania.

Obviously, structural impediments to that in the archaic US system (and to some extent in Britain) make gaining power very difficult, but don't mistake that difficulty with the underlying dynamics of the in the socio-political processes.

Want to win? Advocate- STAND FOR and be perceived as fighting for popular progressive values and policies- and for the groups that back you.

Want to lose? Pander to the right and focus on the ephemeral center, which to paraphrase Jim Hightower, is the realm of dead armadillos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC