Reply #170: No, I meant what I said. You simply do not understand it, no

[msanthrope]

matter how many times it is slowly and carefully explained to you.

This intransigence has blinded you to the larger point--defending Cafiero isn't defending the District.

It surprises me that it has not dawned on you that Cafiero and the District have two different agendas--and thus, different counsel. She isn't using a District lawyer. And she isn't working 'with' them.

You do realize that are defending the person who handed the Plaintiffs gold, at the expense of the District, don't you? Cafiero's 5th allows the Plaintiffs to pursue an adversarial ruling....and that will screw the District, while keeping Cafiero clean.