You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Substance of False Confessions… [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:24 AM
Original message
The Substance of False Confessions…
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 10:24 AM by Jackpine Radical
The Substance of False Confessions

Brandon L. Garrett, University of Virginia School of Law

forthcoming: 62 Stan.L.Rev. _ (2010)

Abstract

A puzzle is raised by cases of false confessions: How could an innocent person convincingly confess to a crime? Post-conviction DNA testing has now exonerated 240 convicts, 39 of whom falsely confessed to rapes and murders. As a result, there is a new awareness that innocent people falsely confess, often due to psychological pressure placed upon them during police interrogations. Scholars increasingly examine the psychological techniques that can cause people to falsely confess and document instances of known false confessions. This Article takes a different approach, by examining the substance of false confessions, including what was said during interrogations and how the confession statements were then litigated at trial and post-conviction. Doing so sheds light on the phenomenon of confession contamination. Not only can innocent people falsely confess, but all except one of these exonerees were induced to deliver false confessions with surprisingly rich, detailed, and accurate information. We now know that those details could not have originated with these innocent people, but rather must have been disclosed to them, most likely during the interrogation process. However, our constitutional criminal procedure does not regulate the post-admission interrogation process, nor do courts evaluate the reliability of confessions. This Article outlines a series of reforms that focus on the insidious problem of contamination, particularly through videotaping interrogations in their entirety, but also by reframing police procedures, trial practice, and judicial review. Unless criminal procedure is reoriented towards the reliability of the substance of confessions, contamination of facts may continue to go undetected, resulting in miscarriages of justice.

------------
Entire working paper version available for download at

http://law.bepress.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC