3. Let's assume for a second that he was released based on our review. Just for the sake of argument.
Edited on Thu Dec-31-09 01:26 PM by Cant trust em
Would this then be an argument for never letting anyone go who is suspected of terrorism?
This seems like another extension of any argument against giving rights to suspected criminals. Should we eliminate miranda rights for suspects just because if they're not administered correctly, someone can get off?
If we're going to have rights for suspects, then occasionally we're going to get bit in the ass.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
