36. It is not constitutional. Not at all. And also, since this current Bill will force
people over 50 to remain unemployed, (Employers cannot afford the premiums on these people) unless they are in some sort of very sought after speciality, there will be plenty of lawsuits over that aspect.
And is AGE not the one great "pre-exisitng" condition? After all the only way you can be fifty two is because last year you were fifty one.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
