You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #170: What If Ron Paul Is Correct? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Boddingham Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
170. What If Ron Paul Is Correct?
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 10:04 PM by Boddingham
What If Ron Paul Is Correct?

What if we had a limited federal government, no federal income taxes, a dollar that is worth a dollar (instead of ten cents, as it is now thanks to the central bank), no military industrial complex, no wars of aggression for oil and control of foreign lands, and a free market? If all of these things came to fruition, would we have that great of a need for welfare and health care? We will never know.

What if we had largely state control over powers not specifically granted to the federal government in the Constitution? Frankly, it is hard to argue with his narrow interpretation of the Constitution. That is because it was intended to be interpreted that way.

Sure. “Times” change. But the Constitution has not changed much, except through interpretation by the Feds, congressional action, executive action, and Supreme Court case law that arguably expands the original meaning. Before the 17th Amendment, Senators were accountable to state legislatures, and therefore by proxy, to the people of the states.

I have been a registered Democrat for 35 years. I did not vote for John McCain or Ron Paul.

Ron Paul did open my eyes to one concept. If all of the powers granted to states and to the people (based upon a narrow interpretation of the powers granted to the federal government), then the people could give the states such hell over their policies, they would probably respond. It is one thing to send an E-mail to a U.S. Senator. It is another thing to drive to the state capitol, bang on your representative’s door and demand action.

Paul thinks the issue of abortion should be left to the states. What would the states do when 150,000 men and women march on the state capitol demanding reproductive rights? Therein lies the power of the people from which Washington and the Supreme Court, are insulated.

I do agree with the ruling in Roe v. Wade. I’m just askin’.

I watched with great scrutiny the democratic and republican debates. Honestly, I don't think any of them are racists in their hearts.

For what it is worth.

Boddingham
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC