Reply #251: You really DO think that's the same, don't you?

[spoony]

Now THAT'S sad. For one thing, a few posts in this thread have said they've NOT encountered any proselytising. Secondly, putting a tract in a bag requires the recipient to do NOTHING. They don't have to read it, or even look at it, so how you could compare it to "forcing" people "to go to a church service" (which the original SA did, in Victorian England) is just more disconnected noise masquerading as rational argument.

That said, it'll be fun on DU if hospitals become part of a national health service and all of a sudden every "St." is considered a retroactive assault on the sanctity of that slave-loving freedom parchment you all worship. Not me, because I know that even after 8 years of REAL abuse, the Constitution is today more "Constitutional" in the way its concepts match its practices than ever in the country's history. But, by all means, keep flailing.