You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #63: nice of you to ignore the actual content in my post. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. nice of you to ignore the actual content in my post.
But hey we'll follow up this tangent. The majority of contamination sources are beta decay emitters, meaning a gamma ray and an electron (for the high energy emitters we're generally concerned with, ie not tritium). beta only provides a skin dose (if it's even powerful enough to do that), while gamma provides a whole body dose. alpha emitters are generally only found in the core, as they primarily exist in the super heavy elements. Neutrons only come from the fission process, which occurs rarely in man made isotopes such as Pu-239 which will undergo spontaneous fission, but is otherwise limited to the core.

Alpha is only dangerous if you eat it, neutrons can create unstable radio isotopes. That said, they're irrelevant in the majority of cases because the primary emission source encountered is gamma, beta will be blocked by clothing, and is generally fairly weak. gamma has a quality factor of 1, which means for every roentgen you pull you will get 1 rem. alpha has 20, neutrons are differant depending on if they're fast or thermal.

if you want to argue about the 'ideal man' used to compute the REM that's fine. It's really all fairly irrelevant since people will still be absorbing similar levels. Sure someone who is overweight will have a greater water mass and tenth thickness and will absorb more radiation. But when you're talking about levels in the millirem spectrum it's irrelevant, since you need to pull a dose of 100 REM in a short period of time to get anywhere near radiation poisoning. All it does is provide a baseline for comparison, that way you can get a standardised number.

But you just go ahead and ignore the legal limit of 20000 pCi/L, and keep posting about that 1000 pCi/L of tritium, which is barely enough to give an internal dose of .2 mrem/yr (assuming you drink 2 liters a day of that source). Of course if you stand next to a cup of water containing that tritium you won't get any dose, since the beta it emits is so weak it can't even give a skin dose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC