You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: Because they aren't really "experts" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Because they aren't really "experts"
NG's fact checkers let everyone down on this one. It aggravates me that a publication as prestegious as National Geographic didn't do a simple google search to make sure the people they were interviewing were the least bit credible. The original article is here: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/09/080909-black-hole_2.html . I mean, "dark matter factory?" Srsly? They betray a fundamental lack of understanding of the terms they are throwing around. My guess is that this is at some sort of desperate cry for attention that the media picked up on account of its sensation value.

The two people mentioned in the article are:

Walter L. Wagner - http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guests/1515.html

A lawyer who claims to be a physicst, but whose only professional training is a physics minor to go along with his biology BS.

Luis Sancho is apparently a random internet kook. His website is here: http://www.unificationtheory.com/astrophysics/starandgalaxy.htm

The Bad Astronomer (Dr. Phil Plait) has a great synopsis of what went wrong here:

http://74.125.45.104/search?q=cache:3frbsSFdHBEJ:blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/29/no-the-lhc-wont-destroy-the-earth/+http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/29/no-the-lhc-wont-destroy-the-earth/&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

Sorry for the long link, the blog entry seems to be returning a 500 error, but the article is still in the google cache.

I hope this has been helpful!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC