she is not ready to *campaign* on day one, but we are to believe

[Cerridwen]

she is ready to lead on day one?

Why isn't anyone pointing out the obvious?

She's hiding in the Ladies' Room going over her Cliff Notes on foreign policy, the Constitution, whether or not the framers of the Constitution wrote the Pledge of Allegiance, whether or not Fannie and Freddie are government entities, and so on and so forth.

She is not taking interviews. She is not ready to campaign. But, she's ready to lead?

Is this too obvious? Not salacious enough? What? It questions neither her sex, her religion, her voting record, nor her honesty. It points to her lack of preparedness. Why isn't this question asked?