You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #78: sure, it could be denial [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #75
78. sure, it could be denial
I admit, in response to the observation that astronomers and meteorologists rarely claim to have encountered aliens, you can offer two explanations:

1.) A better understanding of sky phenomena reduces the need to invoke extraterrestrial visitors

2.) Astronomers and meterologists are all in on a widespread conspiracy to deny the reality of extraterrestrial visits

Occam's Razor is an appealing tool to distinguish among these choices, but nobody can ever be *compelled* to accept that logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC