Reply #93: Excellent post. I've been syaing this all along. Obama's endless platitudes

[bjobotts]

are devoid of any substance or any reality. We need to be partisan or nothing will change. How can Obama expect the very people causing the obstructionism to join in ending it? It's ludicrous. Necessity is the mother of involvement not 'hope'. A starving person 'hopes' he will find food but the fact that he was starving is what motivated him to go in search of food. John Edwards represents this necessity. He alone sees the urgency of stopping the corporate take over of our laws and institutions. He is more aligned with FDR who would have dedicated parts of this speech to Obama to consider: (from FDR's speech at the democratic national convention June 27, 1936)

".....For out of this modern civilization economic royalists carved new dynasties. New kingdoms were built upon concentration of control over material things. Through new uses of corporations, banks and securities, new machinery of industry and agriculture, of labor and capital-all undreamed of by the fathers-the whole structure of modern life was impressed into this royal service.

There was no place among this royalty for our many thousands of small business men and merchants who sought to make a worthy use of the American system of initiative and profit. They were no more free than the worker or the farmer. Even honest and progressive-minded men of wealth, aware of their obligation to their generation, could never know just where they fitted into this dynastic scheme of things.

It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over Government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction. In its service new mercenaries sought to regiment the people, their labor, and their property. And as a result the average man once more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man.

The hours men and women worked, the wages they received, the conditions of their labor-these had passed beyond the control of the people, and were imposed by this new industrial dictatorship. The savings of the average family, the capital of the small business man, the investments set aside for old age-other people's money-these were tools which the new economic royalty used to dig itself in.

Those who tilled the soil no longer reaped the rewards which were their right. The small measure of their gains was decreed by men in distant cities.

Throughout the Nation, opportunity was limited by monopoly. Individual initiative was crushed in the cogs of a great machine. The field open for free business was more and more restricted. Private enterprise, indeed, became too private. It became privileged enterprise, not free enterprise.

An old English judge once said: "Necessitous men are not free men." Liberty requires opportunity to make a living-a living decent according to the standard of the time, a living which gives man not only enough to live by, but something to live for.

For too many of us the political equality we once had won was meaningless in the face of economic inequality. A small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people's property, other people's money, other people's labor-other people's lives. For too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness.

Against economic tyranny such as this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of Government. The collapse of 1929 showed up the despotism for what it was. The election of 1932 was the people's mandate to end it. Under that mandate it is being ended.

The royalists of the economic order have conceded that political freedom was the business of the Government, but they have maintained that economic slavery was nobody's business. They granted that the Government could protect the citizen in his right to vote, but they denied that the Government could do anything to protect the citizen in his right to work and his right to live.

Today we stand committed to the proposition that freedom is no half-and-half affair. If the average citizen is guaranteed equal opportunity in the polling place, he must have equal opportunity in the market place.

These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power. In vain they seek to hide behind the Flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the Flag and the Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob rule and the over-privileged alike...."

snip-end

Get it? Against being ruled or governed through economic tyranny by the over privileged. Edwards knows this. Obama just wants to get elected. Listen to what is actually being said not the manner in which it is spoken. Obama reminds me of the winners of Miss Universe pageant when they say all they want is world peace...DUH! We all want what Obama wants...for everybody to get along and to compromise in order to get what is best for our country but just look at the obstructionism in the senate...republicans are doing it just to prevent dems from getting anything passed for nothing but political reasons without any real consideration of the issues at all. Wake up...Obam is just more of the same...the rule of the money party over the have nots. Look at the issues and not the people. Republicans did everything they could to make a "one party rule" and Obama will not stand against them...he will be used to make 'us' like what 'they' are doing.
Vote Kucinich or Edwards for any real change...However, Edwards is the contender.