Reply #243: What do you think John Conyers was doing down in that basement?

[puebloknot]

Do you suggest that it would take an extensive *further* investigation, prior to beginning an impeachment hearing, to find *anything* that this administration has done that is impeachable?

On another note, in observing your posts to others, as well as to me, I find you argumentative and unwilling to listen to the opinions of others, as well as unwilling to acknowledge that investigations have *already* been done, and far better writers than I have pointed that there is ample evidence for impeachment, just a stubborn refusal on the part of the House to do it.

"They weren't impeachment, therefore in your view they were not investigation." This is disingenuous. The point of my original post was that impeachment is *not* the trial; that happens in the Senate, if the House refers it.