Reply #4: I didn't see it that way.

[DFW]

He only said that he thinks she will be the nominee--different angle.

Whatever--Rove's column was very predictable, almost what was predicted in my own last OP (if I may toot my own horn for a second):

"Rove’s drivel will be so predictable, and so similar to all the right wing garbage we have been served by you up to now, that his ramblings won’t be any more informative (or interesting) than one more drop of guano on a Galápagos island."

Sure enough, that's exactly what it was. Emphasize that Iraq and the war on terror (notice how he bases his arguments on the old RW fantasy that they are the same thing) are going well, blah, blah, blah.

In other words, he is telling the Republican nominee to lie his fool head off, as usual.

So, what else is new Karl? Is THAT all you have to offer for your first Newsweek column? A
thinly disguised ad for No-Doz?