Reply #61: As I said

[EstimatedProphet]

I'M not making judgments. There's not enough information yet.

YOU are the one that said this has to be anthrax.

YOU are the one that then said that means it has to be a government conspiracy.

YOU are drawing conclusions that are not there.

YOU are seeing patterns, but you're forcing everything into that pattern whether it belongs there or not. There is not enough evidence to know whether it belongs there or not. Even if by some chance this turns out to be part of a government conspiracy, YOU ARE JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS MAKING THE CLAIM RIGHT NOW, so you would still be wrong.

A professor of mathematics asks a question to the class involving a very complicated calculus equation. He asks a student at random for an answer. The student has no idea, and says 4. This happens to be the right answer. Was the student right?