You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #709: We haven't had primaries yet. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #624
709. We haven't had primaries yet.
She's not the nominee. The only way Clinton will lose is if the party ignores what a sizable portion of their voting base is saying; that they will not vote for her. If we're irrelevant, then they should chug right ahead-- but if we're not, then people need to rethink who they're backing in the primaries. Either way, if Clinton loses it will not be the fault of people who have said from the very beginning that they would not vote for a pro-war candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC