The original argument was one in favor of impeachment. The line you followed was a sub argument about whether congress is mandated to follow through with such an investigation. And that line only existed because someone suggested that Impeachment proceedings against this administration would be a 'Dog and pony show'
Of course with the degree of criminality of this administration it is easy to get confused. Still I wish you would not latch onto an argument on the posters use (or misuse as the case may be) of language. I would prefer to see you possibly weigh in on whether or not impeachment is a good idea and why or why not.
I understand how a nice smooth status quo sort of thing helps the 'eventuality strategy' that your candidate of choice is employing but really a matter of this gravity deserves a bit more time and courage.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.