You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: The Leaders have a point ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. The Leaders have a point ...
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 10:42 AM by ShortnFiery
When I was an impressionable 18 y.o. first enrolled in R.O.T.C. I loved everything about patrolling and small unit tactics. I joined a group that trained cadets to attend that kick-ass Ranger School and *really*, I mean *really* got into the thought of covert ops. I have trained with numerous SF and Ranger types, to include attending parties that honored Bo Gritz. However by the time of my Regular Army Commissioning (upper 5% of R.O.T.C. graduates) I was beginning to mature and form more of a "real effect" image of combat and it's aftermath. When a (metally healthy & somewhat compassionate) person matures emotionally, all that *take no prisoners* rhetoric is put into perspective as PURE fantasy.

My Point: The reason that I provide my history above is to emphasize: at the age of 17 and 18 years old, the vast majority of our intelligence slotted enlisted soldiers do NOT have the emotional maturity to FULLY understand the repercussions of "violent behavior." The foregoing is NOT a dismissal of their overall intelligence but, I believe, a statement of fact that those under the age of 21 (many under the age of 25) do not have the capacity to "think things through" but instead, live for the moment.

I have changed my philosophy 180 degrees over my lifetime. But I still remember "the rush" of charging through an objective; setting off grenade simulators; firing a LAW; jumping out of perfectly good airplanes; firing a cal 50 and rappelling Australian (face first) off of the local fire tower, etc. etc. Now that I'm an old broad, I feel a little guilty because of the "gung ho" feelings I felt back THEN. :blush: However, I understand the INTENSE allure, especially for very young and impressionable adults. We should, as a people, be careful to not encourage barbarism at this point in our nation's history ... even if it is dubbed as *fiction.*

That's why the portrayals of horrific methods of coercion are NOT good for young adults who sign onto the Military Intelligence MOSes. The instructors have to "train out" the delusions of grandeur that such fantasy programs portray.

Any series and/or movie that GLORIFIES any aspect about WAR or TORTURE does a disservice to our youth. It's always the old powerful men (and some women) who send our treasure (young people) off to kill and die. To glorify MAIMING and KILLING, IMO, is just plain EVIL. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC