You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #257: Hiroshima contained many a military target [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #253
257. Hiroshima contained many a military target
such as headquarters for an army group. IIRC the bomb hit close to it.

It also contianed a variety of other military bases

Yep by that same logic the town I live is a valid military target and if nuked, I hope it is quick

Nagasaki had several manufacturing facilties for military essential goods... and like bearing factories in Euroep was cosidered a valid target. Ironically it was not the main target on the day, since the primary target was cosidered a more valuable point, since it contained a large munitions storage facility

If you ever read the Geneva Convention you'd know that hitting an MHQ is a valid target. Now the collateral was a tad disgusting... and quite more serious than woudl have occurred with firebombing.

As to it ended the war, most mainstream historians accept this as a matter of fact. It has nothing to do with the Kool aid, but this was the last straw and the Emperor finally voted in the council and overrode Tojo and the war party. Some facts help at times

As to the least horrible option, Lynn I hate to point this to you but in some ways it may have been... and this statememt is only one taken with the distance of history and the knowledge of what the other options would have done... in deaths, in casualties and other factors

Now I will ask you the same thing... what are your options? Give me a good solid argument of why we should have carried out Operation Olympic.

Or give me a good solid option why we should have declared victory and gone home

I want the alternative hsitories to cover what would have happened in the Eastern Pacific for the next ten, twenty and fifty years.

Oh and I wil ask this in all seriousness, do you beleive that if the Japanese were able to develop the A Bomb they would not have dropped it on an American City? (Assuming they could reach it)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC