You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #133: The evidence is simply that he has gone to great lengths to get that power [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #127
133. The evidence is simply that he has gone to great lengths to get that power
In answer to my question, why do you think he has gone to such great lengths to get that power, your answer was simply that you didn't know.

Well, if one thinks about it I think that most reasonable people would come to the conclusion that there was probably a reason for Bush to put so much effort into getting that power. The reason most certainly is not that he needs it to catch terrorists. That power already existed. Any time there was the slightest suspicion that communication might involve a terrorist, all Bush would have to do is order that the communication be intercepted, and then seek a warrant afterwards. The law provided for that, and no FISA judge would turn down such a request, and even if he did, no big deal, Bush might get his hand slapped at worst.

The reason he needed this law passed was so that he could spy on his domestic opponents. That is something that even a FISA judge wouldn't approve, so he had to get a law saying that Gonzo would make the determination of whether or not to approve it. Now he has it. Why on earth would he want something like that so badly if he's planning on giving up power in 18 months?

I'm not saying that it's a sure thing. Optimistically, I'm thinking that there's about a 25% chance that the 08 elections will be cancelled. Maybe that's because I'm overly optimistic because I'm in denial about the real possibility.

I think that anyone who dismisses the possibility out of hand has their head in the sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC