You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #102: It is a bad solution to a problem that isn't really a problem. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
102. It is a bad solution to a problem that isn't really a problem.
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 03:51 PM by antfarm
This feature goes well beyond supporting people's right to choose not to engage in certain interactions. It suggests that they have a right to control others in order not be bothered by the very PRESENCE of ideas they dislike.

As participants here, we all have the option of reading or not reading posts directed to us. If someone is harassing you, you do not have to open their posts, or pay any attention to them at all. Problem solved. I think you are seeing the word "childish" not to name-call or insult, but to point out strongly that, as adults, we ALREADY have complete control over what we choose to read and respond to. This feature is not needed for someone who exercises this sort of control.

As others have already stated many times, what is offensive about this new feature is that a single person is been given the power not only to control their OWN experience at DU, but the experience of multiple others.

DU functions like big, wonderful gathering place for generally like-minded people. Imagine going to a party of Democrats where a bunch of conversations are being held. You can always choose not to listen to certain people or pay attention to what they are saying. But you do NOT have the option of saying, "I, personally, decree that this one person must leave this conversation. Not only can't they talk to me, they also can't talk to anyone else in this conversation from now on." If you DO behave like that at the party, people will look at you funny.

Most of all, I simply don't understand the need for this, when every one among us already has the power and the freedom to select which posts we open and which we do not. This new feature creeps very close to saying that we all have the right to be spared the very presence of ideas we don't like, and to inflict our preferences on others. It does not feel Democratic at all.

I hope the administration reconsiders. I think you are making a serious mistake, to the detriment of DU as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC