You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #76: ACLU Slams FBI Plan to Pay Telecoms to Store Phone Records [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
76. ACLU Slams FBI Plan to Pay Telecoms to Store Phone Records
ACLU Slams FBI Plan to Pay Telecoms to Store Phone Records
By Ryan Singel - July 24, 2007
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/07/aclu-slams-fbi-.html


An FBI proposal to pay the nations' telecoms to store phone records for years and to provide instant access to agents raises concerns about American's Constitutional rights, according to the ACLU. The $5 million per year initiative, revealed in the FBI's budget request (.pdf) for 2008, would continue ongoing payments to telecoms to reimburse them for filling emergency phone record requests from counter-terror investigators and be used to convince three telecoms to build special databases to store records for longer periods of time. AT&T and Verizon are two of the companies paid by the FBI, but the identity of the third is unknown.

The Justice Department has been pushing telecoms and ISPs to keep data longer and has pushed legislation to mandate a two-year "data retention" period for phone and internet records. While ISPs and telecoms largely decline to state how long they store information on their customers, ISPs generally destroy IP address records after several months, while phone companies retain long distance billing records for more than a year. The payment approach represents a way to achieve the same ends without convincing Congress or federal regulators to approve its proposals. The contracts also largely keep the issue out of the public eye.

Caroline Fredrickson, the director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office had harsh words for the proposal. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC